Pop Psychology is Not Psychology: The rise and danger of unscientific
concepts in the name of Psychology

Team IIBP Anveshan, Business Psychology, General Psychology, Issue 41, Mental Health, Mental Health Champions, News Corner, Volume 4

In today’s digital age, where a simple online search can yield millions of results on any topic, discerning fact from fiction has become more challenging than ever. Psychology, a rigorous academic discipline rooted in empirical research, isn’t immune to this flood of misinformation. With the rise of “pop psychology”—a blend of oversimplified psychological concepts, catchy headlines, and dubious self-help advice—it’s becoming increasingly difficult for the layperson to distinguish between genuine psychological insights and mere feel-good fluff. It is important to make this distinction clear.

Psychology, in its true form, is grounded in rigorous research, empirical evidence, and years of academic study. It’s a science that evolves with every new research paper and is bound by ethical considerations and peer review. Pop psychology, on the other hand, often comprises oversimplified ideas, presented in an easily digestible format, and while some of it may be based on truth, much of it is not vetted, not scientifically tested, and not always accurate.

Understanding this distinction is paramount. While pop psychology can be entertaining and sometimes even enlightening, it’s crucial to differentiate between a well-researched psychological theory and a catchy concept designed for mass consumption.

Imagine Sarah (named changed), a hardworking mother of two, scrolling through her social media feed. She comes across a post claiming that by understanding whether she’s “left-brained” or “right-brained,” she can unlock the secrets to her personality and potential. Intrigued, Sarah delves deeper, only to find herself navigating a maze of unverified claims, celebrity endorsements, and sensational promises.

But how did we get here? How did these pop psychology concepts become so popular, and what dangers do they pose?

The Mechanisms Behind the Rise of Pop Psychology Rise of PopPsychology can be attributed to two broader set of causes 1. Marketing Tricks and 2. Human Vulnerabilities. Thanks to the years of rigorous scientific studies we know a lot about influencing masses and driving opinions by exploiting the in-built vulnerabilities in Human Nature and those promoting PopPsychology probably know it better than those staying with rigorous, evidence based psychology. Here are some of the TRICKs that propagators of PopPsychology use –

Sensationalism: We live in a world of headlines and soundbites. In the hustle to grab the reader’s attention, many pop psychology proponents resort to sensationalism. They exaggerate claims, make bold (and often unfounded) promises, and present theories as life-changing revelations. Consider the countless self-help books with titles like “Unlock the Secret Power of Your Mind in 30 Days!” or “Master Your Emotions and Rule Your World!” These are catchy, sure, but are they based on actual science? Not always.. Think of them as the “clickbait” of the psychology world—designed to draw you in, but often leaving you with little of substance.

Celebrity endorsements: If a renowned celebrity swears by a particular pop psychology book or concept, it’s bound to gain traction. However, the reality is that these endorsements, while influential, can be misleading.

Just because someone famous believes in a theory doesn’t make it scientifically valid. Remember when a famous movie star raved about a new meditation technique, and suddenly it was all the rage? It’s essential to differentiate between a genuine psychological method and one that’s merely popular because of star power. Shahrukh Khan promoting BYJU’s app as a better learning tool or Hema Malini saying Kent RO gives purest water are examples of endorsement without substance. A PopPsychology product or service always stays “On the shoulder of unrelated giants” (congratulations, if you got the pun 😊 )

Oversimplification: Real psychological research is complex. It takes into account variables, controls for biases, and is often accompanied by caveats. Pop psychology, in its quest for mass appeal, often strips away these complexities, presenting ideas in black and white, ignoring the nuances that are so essential in genuine research. In my coaching sessions and in consulting practice, I often finds myself correcting misconceptions among my coachees and clients. One common misunderstanding is the oversimplified notion of “stress” as an entirely negative phenomenon, ignoring its evolutionary role and the concept of “eustress” or beneficial stress. Another is the notion that “staying positive” is the one solution for all life challenges.

As an evolutionary being, human mind has created a plethora of perceptual shortcuts to be more efficient in the objective of survival. There perceptual shortcuts (also called as ‘cognitive biases’) are another reason why PopPsychology concepts became so widespread and accepted by general public. Top three of these biases are explained below.

Confirmation bias: A senior leader I was coaching believed that he’s a typical “introvert,” preferring solitude over social gatherings. When he stumbles upon a pop psychology article that glorifies introversion as a sign of deep introspection and intelligence, he immediately shares it, further solidifying his belief. This is confirmation bias in action—gravitating towards information that aligns with our pre-existing beliefs. So, when he came to me he had formed so many ‘unexamined’ conceptions about his nature that the most important task for me as a coach was to loosen his rigid beliefs about his own nature and that of others. And, adopt more critical and evidence based perspective.

The Dunning-Kruger effect: This cognitive bias refers to the phenomenon where individuals with low ability at a task overestimate their ability. In the context of pop psychology, it’s easy for someone to read a few articles online and then believe they have a deep understanding of complex psychological concepts, leading them to trust (and spread) misinformation. After reading a few articles on emotional intelligence, Anna (name changed) felt she’s become an expert on the subject. She starts giving advice to friends and family, often misinterpreting concepts.

Desire for quick fixes: Let’s face it, we’re a society that loves instant gratification. The idea of a “quick fix” or a “life hack” is immensely appealing. Pop psychology taps into this desire, offering seemingly simple solutions to complex problems. In our fast-paced world, who wouldn’t want instant solutions? Pop psychology often promises rapid remedies, from “5-minute mindfulness practices” to “10 steps to overcome anxiety.” But genuine psychological growth often requires time, effort, and sometimes professional guidance.

Examples of Unfounded Pop Psychology Concepts

“Left-brained” vs “Right-brained” individuals: It’s a popular notion that “left-brained” people are logical and analytical, while “right-brained” folks are creative and artistic. However, this is a gross oversimplification. While there are areas of the brain specialized for certain tasks, no scientific evidence supports the idea that individuals predominantly use one side of their brain over the other.

The Scam of NLP: Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) has been a buzzword in pop psychology circles for years snd is often championed in pop psychology circles as a transformative tool for personal development. Proponents claim it can help individuals overcome phobias, enhance communication skills, and even achieve personal and professional goals. However, the scientific backing for NLP is limited. While some people may find certain NLP techniques beneficial, it often leads to more harm than good in the long term. Moreover, some studies have found little to no evidence supporting many of NLP’s foundational concepts. It’s essential to approach NLP with a critical mindset and not view it as a panacea for all psychological challenges.

Naveen (name changed), a consultative sales person, attended an expensive NLP workshop, hoping to improve his negotiation skills. He was taught techniques like “mirroring” his client’s body language and using specific “power words” to persuade. Initially excited, Naveen soon realized that while for some the techniques seemed useful, others experienced him as manipulative and inauthentic.

The reality is that while some individuals might find elements of NLP beneficial, it’s not the magic bullet it’s often made out to be. Many foundational concepts of NLP lack empirical evidence. And, alarmingly, some individuals tout NLP as a replacement for traditional therapy, which can deter people from seeking the professional help they might genuinely need.

The concept of “Alpha” and “Beta” personalities: This idea suggests that “Alpha” individuals are dominant, confident, and assertive, while “Beta” individuals are passive and reserved. Not only is this a vast oversimplification of human personalities, but it’s also not grounded in any rigorous psychological research.

The examples are many, there are over 100 PopPsychology concepts that are catchy, sound good but do not stand scientific scrutiny.

Dangers of Relying on Pop Psychology

Misinformation can lead to misguided decisions: Imagine a manager implementing a team-building exercise based on a pop psychology article claiming that people with similar zodiac signs work better together or people with certain personality type are better team mates. While it might seem harmless, such strategies can lead to ineffective team dynamics or even discrimination.

Potential harm to mental health: Relying on oversimplified or unverified psychological advice can be detrimental. Lisa (name changed), for example, tried coping with her depressive symptoms using techniques from a popular online article. Instead of finding relief, her condition worsened because she wasn’t addressing the root causes or seeking professional help.

Overshadowing of scientifically-backed psychological research: Genuine research can get buried under the avalanche of pop psychology content. As a result, important discoveries and evidence-based techniques might not reach those who could benefit from them.

Guidelines for the Public and Practitioners Critical thinking: Before buying into any psychological concept, ask yourself: Where is this information coming from? Is it backed by research? Is the source credible? David, a college student, started cross-referencing pop psychology articles with academic journals. To his surprise, many popular claims lacked scientific support.

Continuous education: Staying updated with peer: reviewed research is essential, especially for practitioners. Dr. Elaine, a practicing psychologist, dedicates a few hours every week to reading the latest studies, ensuring her therapeutic techniques are evidence-based.

Seeking professional advice: Self-help is valuable, but it’s essential to recognize when professional intervention is needed. Consider the story of Alex, who, after years of self-help books and online articles, finally sought therapy and found it transformational. Sometimes, the guidance of a trained expert is irreplaceable.

Conclusion The world of psychology is vast and ever-evolving. While pop psychology can offer accessible insights, it’s crucial to differentiate it from the rigorous, research-backed discipline of psychology. As consumers of information, we must be discerning, critical, and proactive in seeking knowledge. Let’s value genuine psychological research and ensure that the quest for understanding the human mind is rooted in science, not just sensationalism.

Finally, I want to leave you with the words of Carl Sagan, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” As we navigate the intricate maze of psychological information, may we always seek the evidence, prioritize authenticity, and champion the profound depth and nuance that genuine psychology offers.

About the Author